Google’s Chromecast Gets Zapped with a Whopping $338.7M Bill β Oops or Ouch? π€―πΈ
TL;DR: Google’s been slapped with a $338.7 million tab over patent rights with Chromecast. Who’s the real innovator here? π€·ββοΈπΊ
When you think of streaming from your phone to your TV, Chromecast probably pops into your mind, right? Well, hold onto your remotes, because it seems Google mightβve been channel surfing in someone elseβs waters! π²
The good ol’ Texan jury down in Waco declared that the tech giant has violated patent rights linked to the remote-streaming tech, owned by none other than Touchstream Technologies. They claim that they had the idea to “move” videos from a small gadget like your everyday smartphone to your good ol’ big screen TV way back in 2010.
So, what’s the tea? π΅ Touchstream apparently had a lil’ tΓͺte-Γ -tΓͺte with Google back in December 2011, showing off their shiny tech. But, Google played it cool, acting all uninterested. Fast forward to 2013, and boom! Chromecast enters the scene. Coincidence? Touchstream doesn’t think so. Theyβre adamant that Googleβs Chromecast, along with some smart speakers and third-party TVs, copied their brainchild. π§ π²
Now, Googleβs spokesperson, Jose Castaneda, with perhaps a twinge of defiance in his tone, states theyβve always been the cool kids on the block, inventing their tech and never piggybacking off anyone. They plan to appeal, but who will have the last laugh?
Fun side-note: This isnβt Touchstream’s debut in the courtroom drama. The company, also moonlighting as Shodogg, has previously filed complaints against some big cable players: Comcast, Charter, and Altice. The verdict? Still hanging in the balance. βοΈ
So, as we sit back, munch on our popcorn, and enjoy our favorite shows, streaming smoothly from our phones to our TVs, one has to wonder: In the wild world of tech and innovation, who really owns an idea? And whatβs the real cost of “innovation”?
Are we seeing a clash of tech titans or just another episode of corporate ‘he said, she said’? What’s your take? π§πΏ
Question for the masses: In the age of rapid tech evolution, how do we really determine the OGs of innovation? π€π‘